3 years of change of government, public expectations and government priorities

 

Public accountability of those who shed blood on the country's wealth at night is a matter of time

 


Tabdeeli Sarkar Ke 3 Saal


Qazi Samiullah

Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) government has entered its fourth year and Pakistan is facing many internal and external challenges including economic difficulties, political instability in the country, shortage of vaccines to prevent corona, civil war in neighboring Afghanistan and so on. While the country's geo-economic goals are unlikely to be achieved, relations with other neighboring countries, the vacuum created by the US withdrawal from the region, and bilateral ties with China, including C-Pack, are at stake. Matters are also complicated.

Those who have been expecting mediation from former US President Donald Trump on the Kashmir issue have been consoling themselves by celebrating Exploitation Day for two years now and the issue has now come to a standstill internationally.


Washington's priorities have changed since Biden took office, and in his own words, the national security adviser, the US president no longer seems comfortable talking.


Pakistani officials claiming a passionate and personal relationship with Trump have failed to anticipate the changing political situation in the United States and its priorities, and now it is being threatened that if US President Joe Biden continues to ignore the Pakistani leadership, Pakistan has more There are also options.

Referring to the current situation in Afghanistan and the Afghan war, Imran Khan said that he had highlighted from day one that "America's war is not our war. Past rulers helped America and in response Carried out more than 480 drone strikes. "Undoubtedly, the Prime Minister has got the government in a difficult situation and the biggest problem was that he did not have a competent and honest team," said Mange Tange, a politician whose allegiances in every era. In such a situation, the fortress of the minds and minds of the party which were considered as Socrates and Aristotle in the field of departmental reforms and economic field also came to the fore. Therefore, in my view, there is no criticism on the 3-year performance of the government. Because on the one hand they had nothing to play and on the other hand it took some time to sort out the tangled issues. The high and ideal performance of the government has been considered while the people are the fruits of this high and ideal performance They have been unable to get rid of those who are constantly being pushed into the mill of inflation and unemployment.


Apart from the debate over the three-year performance of the caretaker government, Imran Khan's "speech" at the special event (according to media reports) is of paramount importance in terms of its sensitivity. It has been said that mistakes are made not only by politicians but by everyone, but this does not mean that they should fall behind and say bad things.

The mafia is behind the army to overthrow the government. The important thing to note here is that the Prime Minister has shown realism, but the question arises as to whether there are any mistakes on the part of the army and the judiciary. If they have been done, have they ever been rectified? On the one hand, the mistakes of the past have been mentioned and on the other hand, one institution has been given the impression of being the most powerful institution in the state. Tradition is also before us.

There is no doubt that the Afghan war was not ours but a purely American war, but the rulers of the past helped the United States. This statement was made. When the US war against the Soviet Union (Russia) was fought in Afghanistan in 1979, whose government was in the country at that time? And who decided to become an ally of the US in this war? After the US war against the Taliban and Al Qaeda began in Afghanistan, who was in power and who had the privilege of being an American ally in this war? Did the elected representatives of the nation and the people have any role in these wars? Was there interference?


Prime Minister Imran Khan claims that he will take stock of the looted wealth of the country and in this regard accountability process is also underway against the political rulers of the past but is this accountability process being done impartially? While the people are chanting slogans of change and the PTI government for 3 years, so Prime Minister Imran Khan did not need to publicize the 3 years performance of his government. And why Prime Minister Imran Khan has been advised to publicize the performance of his government while the performance of the government is being beaten every day in every corner and square of the country.

Defense institutions are the guarantor of the survival of the state and mutual respect for the institutions is the guarantee of the stability of the state. Why is it brought? However, after the establishment of Pakistan, whoever has shed blood on the security and prosperity of the country should be brought to justice so that no one will dare to betray the beloved homeland from now on. The political rulers of the past are not milkmaids

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post